If the court has imposed a certain obligation on a party in the decision, the decision has acquired legal force and enforceability, and such a party does not voluntarily comply with its obligation, the enforcement of the decision may be requested, i.e. the compulsory performance of the obligation even against the will of the obligated party. The application for enforcement of the decision can be submitted either to the court or to the selected bailiff.

The court may impose an obligation on a party to the proceedings (for example, to pay a certain amount to the other party). To do this, he also determines a time limit, which, as a rule, is three days from the legal force of such a decision. If the participant fails to fulfill his obligation within the specified period, the authorized participant may also seek compliance against his or her will. This is what we call execution of decisions.

Enforcement of the decision can be carried out by the court itself. In such a case, an application for the initiation of enforcement of the decision must be submitted to the district court with local jurisdiction, which shall order enforcement of the decision. However, this method of enforcement of decisions is not widely used in practice. In fact, the court does not actively seek the debtor's property from which it could be satisfied. Such property must indicate the authorized. At the same time, the court cannot carry out several ways of enforcing a decision at the same time - therefore, if it will make deductions from wages, it cannot simultaneously order the sale of movable property. But the advantage is that the beneficiary is not obliged to pay anything.

The second option is enforcement through a bailiff. The latter itself polishes the property and income of the debtor, and all the activity of the creditor is thus purely voluntary. At the same time, it can affect several financial resources at the same time (e.g. income from employment and, in addition, movable and immovable property). The disadvantage is that the costs of conducting the execution and the remuneration of the bailiff are recovered in priority over the actual execution (i.e. the money is received first by the executor and only then by the creditor). In the event of unsuccessful execution, the creditor runs the risk that the execution will be obliged to pay the costs himself.