Protection against unfair competition
Competition between entrepreneurs is beneficial to the economy and thus to society as a whole. Like sport, competition has its own rules, the violation of which we call unfair competition. A competitor commits unfair competition if he acts contrary to the good practices of competition and his conduct is liable to cause injury to other competitors or consumers.
Thus, the purpose of protection against unfair competition is to ensure that the person concerned is not further threatened or violated, or that the defective situation is eliminated. Next to that compensation for the damage caused may also be claimed.
The conduct in unfair competition is determined by the fulfillment of some of the defined “factual bases”, which describe the most frequent infringements of competitors (e.g. deceptive advertising, comparative advertising, breach of trade secrets etc.), in other cases introduced by the case-law, or by the general fulfilment of the 'general clause', i.e. (albeit potentially) damaging conduct contrary to the good morals of competition.
As a rule, the actions of a competitor who, when offering his product, violates any regulation, thereby gaining an unjustified advantage over other competitors, is also harmful.
In court, the person whose right has been threatened or infringed by the unfair competition may, in particular, demand against the violator that unfair competition be held abstained, or to removed a faulty condition. Furthermore, it may require reasonable satisfaction, compensation for damages and the granting of unjust enrichment.
A frequent and effective tool of protection is the design Preliminary measurethat can ensure immediate (albeit temporary) protection of rights.
After that, it is necessary to administer as well Restraining action in order to permanently prevent the violator from acting, or not to carry out the threatened action (however, it must be a real and immediate threat against which the court may intervene as a precautionary measure). The defective state must then continue at the time of the judgment (except in situations where there is a risk of repetition of the defective act). Disposal lawsuit it is then applied in a situation where it is not possible to successfully sue with a delaying action. The aim of this lawsuit is then to eliminate a defective condition that arose in the past.