Insurance Claims (Disputes over Insurance Payouts)

Claims for insurance payouts are a frequent type of legal dispute, as the insured parties (policyholders) often have a drastically different perspective on the damage event, the extent of the damage, and the interpretation of the insurance terms compared to the insurance company. As a result, these disputes often have to be settled by a court.

Damage Event Covered by Insurance

The basic prerequisite for a claim for insurance payouts is the occurrence of an insured event, i.e., damage or injury to the insured property or injury to the insured person’s health, in a manner stipulated by the insurance contract. The most common insurance events are traffic accidents, where the participants are obligatorily covered by liability insurance, leading to both property damage and personal injury or death. Other common disputes involve property insurance, particularly in connection with natural disasters such as heavy rainfall, floods, landslides, or fires.

Claims Processing

The process of handling insurance claims is generally similar for all types of insurance:

  1. Reporting the Insurance Event

If you suffer damage or injury covered by insurance, you are typically required to report the event to the insurer without unnecessary delay (the exact time frame is usually specified in the insurance conditions) and follow the insurer's instructions for handling the claim. The insured party is obligated to provide evidence of the damage and, if necessary, allow the insurer to inspect the damaged property or verify the circumstances of the event. At this stage, it is advisable to consider representation by an insurance broker or even a lawyer.

  1. Claims Handling

During the claims handling process, the insurer investigates the circumstances of the reported event, determines whether it is covered by the insurance, and assesses the extent of the damage that needs to be compensated. Insurers usually have a dedicated claims department, although sometimes external specialized companies are tasked with claims processing.

  1. Conclusion of Claims Investigation

The insurer concludes the claims handling process by determining the compensable amount of damage or injury. If the insured disagrees with the insurer's assessment, they can file a complaint. At this stage, another department of the insurer may review the claim, potentially increasing the payout or rejecting the complaint. Often, insurance claims are successfully resolved with the help of a lawyer at this pre-litigation stage. If legal representation is already necessary at this stage and the lawyer is successful, they are also entitled to a flat fee to cover legal costs, just as if the case had gone to court.

Lawsuit for Insurance Payout

If efforts to resolve the claim with the insurer fail, or are only partially successful, the insured may have no other option but to pursue the claim through the courts. At this point, legal representation by a lawyer is typically indispensable. The central issue in such a dispute is whether an insured event occurred, i.e., damage or injury to the insured property or person’s health, and whether it happened in a manner covered by the insurance contract. Disputes often arise over whether the damage event is included among the insured risks.

In some cases, the issue may be a purely legal interpretation of the insurance terms, but it can also involve expert assessment, such as determining whether the physical cause of the damage meets the definition outlined in the insurance conditions. Experts also frequently assess the credibility or likelihood of the accident event in cases where the insurer disputes the extent of the damage caused by the insured event.

Another common point of contention is the amount of damage or non-pecuniary injury caused. Experts often play a major role in these cases, whether assessing the cost of repairs, vehicle rentals, or determining the depreciation in the market value of a vehicle due to the insured event. Disputes also often center on the interpretation of the insurance terms (i.e., whether and to what extent the damage is covered by the insurance). It is not uncommon for insurance terms to be ambiguous. If the terms allow for multiple interpretations, the insurer’s terms should be interpreted in the way most favorable to the insured, as is generally the case with contracts concluded with consumers.

A dispute over an insurance payout can be legally and factually complex. However, an experienced lawyer is able to assess the claim and the chances of success in a pragmatic way and recommend an appropriate course of action so that the insured can effectively assert their claims while minimizing the risk of failure.

Good News

The good news is that insurers usually do not engage in disputes "as a rule," but only out of necessity, as they are obliged to act as prudent managers. They are often reluctant to admit insurance claims that they do not consider to be clear-cut. However, once a first-instance court decision is made, or a specific issue is clarified before the court, the insurer is more likely to settle the dispute amicably.

časté otázky

Co je dobré vědět o této oblasti?

What is an illegal decision of the authority?

The right to compensation for damage caused by an unlawful decision has the parties (including omissions) in which a decision was issued, as a result of which they suffered property or non-property damage. However, it is not enough just to disagree with the decision or to seek its annulment or to declare it incorrect at the next instance. Compensation can only be claimed if the decision has been annulled or changed for illegality after it has become legal (or if the decision is non-final but enforceable).

What is maladministration?

The definition of “maladministration” is quite broad, but in general it can be described as a violation of binding rules prescribed by legal norms for the conduct of a public authority in its activities, to which it is obliged and authorized on the basis of generally binding legislation. However, in the case of maladministration, this is not an illegal decision, but the procedure of the authority, which was subsequently reflected in its decision. It is often an unreasonable length of proceedings, where, although the decision given is legal in itself, the time until it is issued is contrary to procedural rules or reasonableness and the parties are therefore entitled to compensation for delays in the proceedings.

It is important not to miss the deadline for filing a lawsuit

Any claim or right must be exercised in a timely manner, that is, before the expiration of the limitation period and sometimes even a significantly shorter limitation period. While ordinary civil claims (for performance or damages) usually expire after 3 years, in a number of cases (administrative actions, actions for annulment in employment, rental or corporate matters) these are units of months! In any case, the sooner you seek out a professional, the more chances there will be to exercise the right properly and in a timely manner.

Do I need to be represented by a lawyer in the proceedings?

In general, it is not necessary to be represented by a lawyer in the proceedings before the court. Exceptions are appeal proceedings, cassation complaints, proceedings before the Constitutional Court and cases of so-called necessary defence in criminal cases. However, we recommend representation by a lawyer in the remaining proceedings, especially since the lawyer will recommend the client the most appropriate course of action to protect the client's rights.

What to do if I received an (electronic) payment order?

A duly served payment order becomes legal if you do not file an objection to the payment order within 15 days from the date of delivery, in the court that issued the payment order. In opposition, you express your disagreement with the imposed obligation and the court will therefore cancel the payment order. Subsequently, you will have a period of 30 days, in which you must indicate for what reason you do not agree with the filed lawsuit. If you did not complete such a justification, the court could rule by judgment of recognition.

Do you have other questions or
would you like to discuss your
specific situation?

Arrange a consultation
JUDr. Vít Kučera, MBA
Vít has extensive experience in representing clients before domestic and foreign courts, especially in commercial disputes. He specializes in preliminary measures, which he also deals with in his publishing activities. Since 2013 he also serves as an arbitrator of the Football Association of the Czech Republic.
More information
Mgr. Martin Tůma, Ph.D.
Martin mainly deals with commercial cases, including disputes arising from unfair competition, damages or insurance claims. He likes to look for simple solutions to (seemingly) complex problems. He also deals with construction law, in connection with which he represents clients in negotiations with administrative authorities and before the courts.
More information
JUDr. Lukáš Šikel
Lukáš is a lawyer specializing in litigation, both in court and in arbitration proceedings. He has represented clients in simple disputes, debt collection, as well as in complex cases, such as those in construction law. He also has experience representing clients in enforcement proceedings and insolvency cases.
More information
JUDr. Aleš Linhart, Ph.D.
Aleš specializes in disputes in the areas of real estate, liability for defects in construction, particularly in transportation infrastructure, the automotive industry, damage compensation and insurance, as well as pre-contractual liability. He represents clients in international arbitrations, including investment arbitrations. You can also appoint him as an arbitrator, as he is listed in the register of arbitrators of the Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and the Agrarian Chamber of the Czech Republic.
More information
Mgr. Kateřina Obertová
Kateřina has been involved in legal disputes since the beginning of her long-standing legal practice, during which she has dealt primarily with disputes arising from civil and commercial contracts, as well as cases related to family law and real estate ownership. In her legal practice, she places great importance on clarity and empathy, striving to offer clients functional and practical solutions.
More information
JUDr. Ing. Vít Švestka
Vít is a lawyer specializing in solving problems in the field of tax law before the tax authorities and the courts. He also acts as a tax advisor and thus can provide additional valuable advice and experience on how to reduce the risk of initiating proceedings at all. Vít also deals with corporate disputes. In addition to his legal education, he also holds a degree from the University of Economics in Prague, where he also participates in teaching and publishing activities.
More information
Mgr. Marie Timoščuková
Marie is an expert in labor law. She has extensive experience representing clients in employment disputes, from both sides of the "barricade" — that is, on behalf of both employers and employees. She has successfully defended the validity of many dismissals and has also helped employees recover numerous unlawfully withheld wages.
More information
Mgr. Vojtěch Adámek
Vojtěch is an experienced lawyer specializing mainly in disputes over claims arising from contracts, including settlement of parties after termination of contracts, debt collection and disputes over compensation for damage (damages). He considers understanding the client's needs and finding effective and pragmatic solutions together, including extrajudicial termination of disputes, as the key to success.
More information
Další oblasti sporu