Disputes within the Homeowners' Association (SVJ)

Since the Homeowners' Association (SVJ) is a legal entity managing the shared interests of many owners with different interests, whose membership in the SVJ is inherently linked to the ownership of a unit, there is a significant potential for disputes within the SVJ. These disputes may even result in litigation. The most common types of disputes are addressed in this article.

Like any other legal entity, the Homeowners' Association (SVJ) must have an organizational structure (the bodies of the SVJ) – at least the highest body, which is the general meeting consisting of all unit owners voting according to the size of their shares, and the statutory body, which is the board or chairman elected by the general meeting.

It is the board or chairman who is primarily responsible for the management of the building and land. They act on behalf of the SVJ externally and make decisions on all matters that are not entrusted by law or the statutes to the general meeting, or those that the general meeting has not reserved for itself (for example, changes to the statutes, election of board members or chairman, approval of the budget, or decisions about the payment of services and contributions).

In performing their duties, the board members or chairman are required to act with the so-called "due care of a prudent manager." This demands a certain level of knowledge, skills, diligence, and loyalty towards the SVJ. Board members (or the chairman), whether elected from the ranks of SVJ members or as external professionals, are liable for damage caused to the SVJ by breaching this due care (e.g., if they fail to properly collect the SVJ’s receivables, waste entrusted funds, or neglect to ensure the fulfillment of obligations and other duties of the SVJ). Moreover, if they do not compensate for the damage, they will be personally liable for the unpaid damage to the SVJ's creditors who have not received payment from the SVJ.

Debts of SVJ Members for the Management of the Building and Service Contributions

Membership in the SVJ carries rights and obligations for the unit owner, which are often subject to dispute, most commonly regarding the failure to contribute to the management of the building and land or to pay service contributions related to the use of the unit, as arranged by the SVJ. In such cases, the statutory body of the SVJ is obliged to collect the outstanding contributions and service payments from the delinquent owner, even through court proceedings if necessary.

Enforcement of SVJ Rules for Building and Land Management

Another legal obligation of unit owners is to comply with the rules for the management of the building and land. These rules can be specified in the SVJ’s statutes and further detailed in the house rules. These rules apply not only to the owners themselves but also to tenants, visitors, or other persons granted access to the building by the owner.

The unit owner is responsible for ensuring that the people they allow into the building also adhere to the building and land management rules. The SVJ can also establish reasonable fines for violating the established rules in its statutes. These fines can also become a source of dispute.

Order for the Sale of a Unit of an Owner Violating SVJ Rules

In extreme cases of persistent violation of obligations, the SVJ, with the consent of the majority of unit owners, can request a court order for the sale of the unit of an owner who, despite a written warning from the SVJ, continues to violate their duties in a way that substantially limits or prevents the exercise of the rights of other unit owners.

Disputes Between SVJ and Members Regarding Compensation for Damage

If a unit owner causes damage to the common areas, they are naturally required to compensate for it. Damage may include, for example, costs incurred by the SVJ for extra cleaning or repairs of common areas damaged during a renovation carried out by the owner in their unit.

On the other hand, one could also imagine a scenario where damage is caused to one of the unit owners during repairs to common areas. In this case, the owner is entitled to seek compensation for such damage from the SVJ.

Neighbor Disputes Among SVJ Members

Conflicts between unit owners are also common, especially in cases of "nuisance," where one owner causes excessive disturbance or limitation to another due to activities in their own unit (e.g., noise, smell, smoke, etc.), thereby limiting the neighbor's ability to enjoy their unit. We have contributed to a series of articles on neighbor disputes, which can be read here.

Appeal Against a Decision of the SVJ General Meeting

As mentioned earlier, decisions on the most important matters of the SVJ are made at the general meeting, where all unit owners vote, with each owner having a number of votes corresponding to the size of their share in the common parts of the building and land. If there is an important reason (e.g., when deciding on the election of statutory body members, extensive reconstruction, or when procedural rules for making decisions have been substantially violated), the law allows the outvoted owners and those who could not attend the meeting for serious reasons to appeal the decision within three months of learning about the problematic decision (or when they could have learned about it).

The outvoted owner may also request the court to temporarily prohibit the implementation of the decision until the appeal is decided. If the appeal is successful and the decision of the general meeting has caused damage to the outvoted owner, the owner is entitled to claim compensation from the SVJ – for more information on compensation for damage, please refer to the section on Compensation for Damage.

časté otázky

Co je dobré vědět o této oblasti?

What is an illegal decision of the authority?

The right to compensation for damage caused by an unlawful decision has the parties (including omissions) in which a decision was issued, as a result of which they suffered property or non-property damage. However, it is not enough just to disagree with the decision or to seek its annulment or to declare it incorrect at the next instance. Compensation can only be claimed if the decision has been annulled or changed for illegality after it has become legal (or if the decision is non-final but enforceable).

What is maladministration?

The definition of “maladministration” is quite broad, but in general it can be described as a violation of binding rules prescribed by legal norms for the conduct of a public authority in its activities, to which it is obliged and authorized on the basis of generally binding legislation. However, in the case of maladministration, this is not an illegal decision, but the procedure of the authority, which was subsequently reflected in its decision. It is often an unreasonable length of proceedings, where, although the decision given is legal in itself, the time until it is issued is contrary to procedural rules or reasonableness and the parties are therefore entitled to compensation for delays in the proceedings.

It is important not to miss the deadline for filing a lawsuit

Any claim or right must be exercised in a timely manner, that is, before the expiration of the limitation period and sometimes even a significantly shorter limitation period. While ordinary civil claims (for performance or damages) usually expire after 3 years, in a number of cases (administrative actions, actions for annulment in employment, rental or corporate matters) these are units of months! In any case, the sooner you seek out a professional, the more chances there will be to exercise the right properly and in a timely manner.

Do I need to be represented by a lawyer in the proceedings?

In general, it is not necessary to be represented by a lawyer in the proceedings before the court. Exceptions are appeal proceedings, cassation complaints, proceedings before the Constitutional Court and cases of so-called necessary defence in criminal cases. However, we recommend representation by a lawyer in the remaining proceedings, especially since the lawyer will recommend the client the most appropriate course of action to protect the client's rights.

What to do if I received an (electronic) payment order?

A duly served payment order becomes legal if you do not file an objection to the payment order within 15 days from the date of delivery, in the court that issued the payment order. In opposition, you express your disagreement with the imposed obligation and the court will therefore cancel the payment order. Subsequently, you will have a period of 30 days, in which you must indicate for what reason you do not agree with the filed lawsuit. If you did not complete such a justification, the court could rule by judgment of recognition.

Do you have other questions or
would you like to discuss your
specific situation?

Arrange a consultation
JUDr. Vít Kučera, MBA
Vít has extensive experience in representing clients before domestic and foreign courts, especially in commercial disputes. He specializes in preliminary measures, which he also deals with in his publishing activities. Since 2013 he also serves as an arbitrator of the Football Association of the Czech Republic.
More information
Mgr. Martin Tůma, Ph.D.
Martin mainly deals with commercial cases, including disputes arising from unfair competition, damages or insurance claims. He likes to look for simple solutions to (seemingly) complex problems. He also deals with construction law, in connection with which he represents clients in negotiations with administrative authorities and before the courts.
More information
JUDr. Lukáš Šikel
Lukáš is a lawyer specializing in litigation, both in court and in arbitration proceedings. He has represented clients in simple disputes, debt collection, as well as in complex cases, such as those in construction law. He also has experience representing clients in enforcement proceedings and insolvency cases.
More information
JUDr. Aleš Linhart, Ph.D.
Aleš specializes in disputes in the areas of real estate, liability for defects in construction, particularly in transportation infrastructure, the automotive industry, damage compensation and insurance, as well as pre-contractual liability. He represents clients in international arbitrations, including investment arbitrations. You can also appoint him as an arbitrator, as he is listed in the register of arbitrators of the Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and the Agrarian Chamber of the Czech Republic.
More information
Mgr. Kateřina Obertová
Kateřina has been involved in legal disputes since the beginning of her long-standing legal practice, during which she has dealt primarily with disputes arising from civil and commercial contracts, as well as cases related to family law and real estate ownership. In her legal practice, she places great importance on clarity and empathy, striving to offer clients functional and practical solutions.
More information
JUDr. Ing. Vít Švestka
Vít is a lawyer specializing in solving problems in the field of tax law before the tax authorities and the courts. He also acts as a tax advisor and thus can provide additional valuable advice and experience on how to reduce the risk of initiating proceedings at all. Vít also deals with corporate disputes. In addition to his legal education, he also holds a degree from the University of Economics in Prague, where he also participates in teaching and publishing activities.
More information
Mgr. Marie Timoščuková
Marie is an expert in labor law. She has extensive experience representing clients in employment disputes, from both sides of the "barricade" — that is, on behalf of both employers and employees. She has successfully defended the validity of many dismissals and has also helped employees recover numerous unlawfully withheld wages.
More information
Mgr. Vojtěch Adámek
Vojtěch is an experienced lawyer specializing mainly in disputes over claims arising from contracts, including settlement of parties after termination of contracts, debt collection and disputes over compensation for damage (damages). He considers understanding the client's needs and finding effective and pragmatic solutions together, including extrajudicial termination of disputes, as the key to success.
More information
Další oblasti sporu