Compensation for delays in proceedings

You have the right to compensation for delays in proceedings if the competent authority has not made a decision within a reasonable (statutory) period. If it is not a negligible harm (which can be compensated by an apology), compensation in money is provided. Every party has the right to compensation, whether successful or not.

In order to assess for yourself what compensation you may be entitled to for delays in proceedings, we have prepared the following overview on the basis of the current case-law.

Amount of compensation

For each year of delays, compensation is usually provided in the range of 15,000 to 20,000 CZK, which can then be reduced or increased by up to 50% depending on:

(a) the importance of the proceedings for the injured party;

b) the complexity of the proceedings (the extent of the case, the need for proof, etc. );

(c) the effect of the injured party on the duration of the proceedings (possible complicity in delays); and

(d) the conduct of the administrative authorities or courts in the proceedings (as a rule, account is taken of how many authorities and at what stage they decided).

Compensation is thus provided especially for delays in criminal proceedings, which may occur after three years of proceedings. Procrastination caused by administrative authorities or civil courts is usually considered to be the duration of proceedings exceeding six years.

In some cases, it may not even be a single proceeding, whereas, for example, the zoning procedure and the subsequent change of location procedure can in some cases be considered as a single whole in terms of the length of the proceedings.

Separately, there are also possible claims for property damage, which in some cases may arise, for example, if the state authorities unlawfully withhold goods or other property of the entrepreneur.

Examples of the amount of compensation

The following examples of compensation awarded for delays in proceedings can be cited from judicial practice:

a) u prosecution of a natural person (the length is calculated from the date of communication of the accusation, not from the beginning of the investigation) 8 years ---- 70,000 CZK;

(b) six years Ongoing proceedings simple building permit for landscaping the garden ---- 94,000 CZK for each of the spouses who jointly applied for permission;

c) beyond nine years in the ongoing procedure for the removal of the colonnade structure, compensation was awarded in the amount of 118,000 CZK and others 67,000 CZK for delays in the proceedings themselves for compensation for delays;

d) u construction management relating to the residence of the natural person for the duration of the 19 years ---- 420,000 CZK;

(e) recovery of a current receivable arising from trade between companies of duration 13 years ---- 75,000 CZK.

Method of application

The claim must first be filed with the relevant ministry, which has 6 months to decide on the claim. After that, it can be appealed to the court. In proceedings against the State, it is an advantage that the State (in the event of the applicant's failure) generally does not have the right to reimbursement of the costs of the proceedings. Thus, the application of a claim does not carry nearly as much risk of failure as ordinary civil proceedings.

časté otázky

Co je dobré vědět o této oblasti?

What is maladministration?

The definition of “maladministration” is quite broad, but in general it can be described as a violation of binding rules prescribed by legal norms for the conduct of a public authority in its activities, to which it is obliged and authorized on the basis of generally binding legislation. However, in the case of maladministration, this is not an illegal decision, but the procedure of the authority, which was subsequently reflected in its decision. It is often an unreasonable length of proceedings, where, although the decision given is legal in itself, the time until it is issued is contrary to procedural rules or reasonableness and the parties are therefore entitled to compensation for delays in the proceedings.

What is an illegal decision of the authority?

The right to compensation for damage caused by an unlawful decision has the parties (including omissions) in which a decision was issued, as a result of which they suffered property or non-property damage. However, it is not enough just to disagree with the decision or to seek its annulment or to declare it incorrect at the next instance. Compensation can only be claimed if the decision has been annulled or changed for illegality after it has become legal (or if the decision is non-final but enforceable).

Should I oppose the lawsuit if I recognize the claim?

Even if you accept the claim, it is better to prevent a court decision on it, for example, by paying the debt earlier or by agreeing with the claimant, as the court will usually also impose an obligation on you to pay the costs of the plaintiff's proceedings. However, the plaintiff often has the will to agree to withdraw the action in exchange for at least partial or earlier payment of the debt. It always makes sense to at least attempt an extrajudicial action.

How to claim damage caused by the state?

A claim for compensation for damage caused by the state is applied in a different procedure than a normal claim. The first step is to apply for compensation to the competent authority, often the ministry. If the Office does not grant compensation within 6 months of the submission of the application, judicial enforcement may be initiated. In such proceedings, the injured party is partially advantaged, for example, by a reduced court fee and substantially lower costs in the event of failure.

Where do I file a lawsuit? And where's the appeal?

To file an action, it is necessary to designate a court of substantive and local jurisdiction. The district court (district court in Prague) is usually competent in the case. Local jurisdiction is usually determined according to the defendant's place of residence or domicile in the case of a legal entity.

Do you have other questions or
would you like to discuss your
specific situation?

Arrange a consultation
JUDr. Vít Kučera, MBA
Vít has extensive experience in representing clients before domestic and foreign courts, especially in commercial disputes. He specializes in preliminary measures, which he also deals with in his publishing activities. Since 2013 he also serves as an arbitrator of the Football Association of the Czech Republic.
More information
Mgr. Martin Tůma, Ph.D.
Martin mainly deals with commercial cases, including disputes arising from unfair competition, damages or insurance claims. He likes to look for simple solutions to (seemingly) complex problems. He also deals with construction law, in connection with which he represents clients in negotiations with administrative authorities and before the courts.
More information
Mgr. Kateřina Obertová
Kateřina has been involved in litigation since the beginning of her long legal practice, during which she dealt mainly with disputes arising from civil and commercial law contracts, as well as cases concerning family law or property ownership. In advocacy, he bases himself on clarity and empathy, with which he tries to offer functional and practical solutions to clients.
More information
JUDr. Ing. Vít Švestka
Vít is a lawyer specializing in solving problems in the field of tax law before the tax authorities and the courts. He also acts as a tax advisor and thus can provide additional valuable advice and experience on how to reduce the risk of initiating proceedings at all. Vít also deals with corporate disputes. In addition to his legal education, he also holds a degree from the University of Economics in Prague, where he also participates in teaching and publishing activities.
More information
Mgr. Marie Timoščuková
Marie is an expert in labor law. Therefore, he also has extensive experience in representation in labor disputes in the field of labor law, from both sides of the “barricade”, that is, on the part of both employers and employees. Thus, it has not only successfully defended the validity of the dismissal, but also obtained many illegally withheld bonuses to employees.
More information
Mgr. Vojtěch Adámek
Vojtěch is an experienced lawyer specializing mainly in disputes over claims arising from contracts, including settlement of parties after termination of contracts, debt collection and disputes over compensation for damage (damages). He considers understanding the client's needs and finding effective and pragmatic solutions together, including extrajudicial termination of disputes, as the key to success.
More information
Další oblasti sporu