Protection of intellectual property

The goal of most entrepreneurs is to create or invent something unique, new and ideally innovative. As a rule, the result of such activity is intangible goods, whether in the form of a brand, a unique technical solution or know-how, which in themselves represent a significant value and often constitute the vast majority of the value of the companies.

The protection of these rights (IP rights in short) is ensured by intellectual property rights, in particular copyright and related rights, as well as trademarks, patents, utility and industrial designs and domain law.

Protection of intellectual property

In order for intangible goods not to be misused by another person and retain their uniqueness and value, they must enjoy proper protection. By means of intellectual property law instruments, it is possible to prevent the possible use of these intangible goods by another person and thus ensure the exclusivity of their use only by an authorized person.

Trademarks

Probably the most common tool for protecting IP is trademarks, which tend to be the most frequent subject of disputes in this area. This is any sign made up of words, colors, letters, product shape, product packaging or even sound. Such a designation is intended, in particular, to distinguish a particular product from a competitor's product and thus distinguish not only the product itself, but also its originator. If a trade mark is registered, no one other than the proprietor of that trade mark may use a sign identical or similar to it in trade in connection with the goods or services for which the mark is protected.

If, nevertheless, such use occurs, the authorized person (originator, author, owner) has the right to seek redress, that is, in particular, for the infringer to refrain from encroaching on his rights. In addition, the authorized person has the right to request from a third party the provision of information on the origin of products or services marketed under the same or interchangeable designations, or the right to apply to the competent court for a preliminary injunction or, where appropriate, the right to seek compensation for damages, the granting of unjust enrichment or reasonable satisfaction from the infringer.

Protecting know-how

A current and also very frequent subject of dispute is know-how, which constitutes a separate component of intellectual property. It is a secret, substantial and identified set of practical unpatented information. In practice, this may be, for example, a specific process of production of a product, technical information or software, the common feature of which is that it provides a certain advantage in the market. The protection of know-how itself consists, in particular, in the active action of its owner, that is, in the efforts to define the know-how in question, to value it and to create a system for its sufficient secrecy. However, know-how can also become part of a trade secret, at a time when it is competitively significant, determinable, valuable and normally unavailable. In such a case, its unauthorized disclosure, disclosure or personal use constitutes unfair competitive conduct. Protection against such conduct is then analogous to that of unauthorised use of a trade mark, in the context of the means used to enforce industrial property rights.

Judicial enforcement of intellectual property rights

However, unauthorised infringement of trade mark rights, infringement of copyright or infringement of protected industrial rights may in practice not only remain at the civil level, since both infringements can also be classified as criminal offences. In addition to the means of private law, it is also possible to protect your intangible assets with the help of criminal law. The filing of a criminal complaint can even offer a number of advantages, especially in the event of an evidentiary emergency in a civil dispute. Law enforcement authorities, on the basis of the so-called investigative principle, have a wide range of powers that allow them to secure the necessary evidence, which can then be used in civil litigation.

Ensuring the protection of your intellectual property rights, including possible registration or other administrative steps, and in particular the dispute itself before a court or other administrative authority, can entail a number of pitfalls and complications. Therefore, in such cases, we recommend that you always seek professional legal assistance.

časté otázky

Co je dobré vědět o této oblasti?

What is an illegal decision of the authority?

The right to compensation for damage caused by an unlawful decision has the parties (including omissions) in which a decision was issued, as a result of which they suffered property or non-property damage. However, it is not enough just to disagree with the decision or to seek its annulment or to declare it incorrect at the next instance. Compensation can only be claimed if the decision has been annulled or changed for illegality after it has become legal (or if the decision is non-final but enforceable).

What is maladministration?

The definition of “maladministration” is quite broad, but in general it can be described as a violation of binding rules prescribed by legal norms for the conduct of a public authority in its activities, to which it is obliged and authorized on the basis of generally binding legislation. However, in the case of maladministration, this is not an illegal decision, but the procedure of the authority, which was subsequently reflected in its decision. It is often an unreasonable length of proceedings, where, although the decision given is legal in itself, the time until it is issued is contrary to procedural rules or reasonableness and the parties are therefore entitled to compensation for delays in the proceedings.

It is important not to miss the deadline for filing a lawsuit

Any claim or right must be exercised in a timely manner, that is, before the expiration of the limitation period and sometimes even a significantly shorter limitation period. While ordinary civil claims (for performance or damages) usually expire after 3 years, in a number of cases (administrative actions, actions for annulment in employment, rental or corporate matters) these are units of months! In any case, the sooner you seek out a professional, the more chances there will be to exercise the right properly and in a timely manner.

Do I need to be represented by a lawyer in the proceedings?

In general, it is not necessary to be represented by a lawyer in the proceedings before the court. Exceptions are appeal proceedings, cassation complaints, proceedings before the Constitutional Court and cases of so-called necessary defence in criminal cases. However, we recommend representation by a lawyer in the remaining proceedings, especially since the lawyer will recommend the client the most appropriate course of action to protect the client's rights.

What to do if I received an (electronic) payment order?

A duly served payment order becomes legal if you do not file an objection to the payment order within 15 days from the date of delivery, in the court that issued the payment order. In opposition, you express your disagreement with the imposed obligation and the court will therefore cancel the payment order. Subsequently, you will have a period of 30 days, in which you must indicate for what reason you do not agree with the filed lawsuit. If you did not complete such a justification, the court could rule by judgment of recognition.

Do you have other questions or
would you like to discuss your
specific situation?

Arrange a consultation
JUDr. Vít Kučera, MBA
Vít has extensive experience in representing clients before domestic and foreign courts, especially in commercial disputes. He specializes in preliminary measures, which he also deals with in his publishing activities. Since 2013 he also serves as an arbitrator of the Football Association of the Czech Republic.
More information
Mgr. Martin Tůma, Ph.D.
Martin mainly deals with commercial cases, including disputes arising from unfair competition, damages or insurance claims. He likes to look for simple solutions to (seemingly) complex problems. He also deals with construction law, in connection with which he represents clients in negotiations with administrative authorities and before the courts.
More information
JUDr. Lukáš Šikel
Lukáš is a lawyer specializing in litigation, both in court and in arbitration proceedings. He has represented clients in simple disputes, debt collection, as well as in complex cases, such as those in construction law. He also has experience representing clients in enforcement proceedings and insolvency cases.
More information
JUDr. Aleš Linhart, Ph.D.
Aleš specializes in disputes in the areas of real estate, liability for defects in construction, particularly in transportation infrastructure, the automotive industry, damage compensation and insurance, as well as pre-contractual liability. He represents clients in international arbitrations, including investment arbitrations. You can also appoint him as an arbitrator, as he is listed in the register of arbitrators of the Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and the Agrarian Chamber of the Czech Republic.
More information
Mgr. Kateřina Obertová
Kateřina has been involved in legal disputes since the beginning of her long-standing legal practice, during which she has dealt primarily with disputes arising from civil and commercial contracts, as well as cases related to family law and real estate ownership. In her legal practice, she places great importance on clarity and empathy, striving to offer clients functional and practical solutions.
More information
JUDr. Ing. Vít Švestka
Vít is a lawyer specializing in solving problems in the field of tax law before the tax authorities and the courts. He also acts as a tax advisor and thus can provide additional valuable advice and experience on how to reduce the risk of initiating proceedings at all. Vít also deals with corporate disputes. In addition to his legal education, he also holds a degree from the University of Economics in Prague, where he also participates in teaching and publishing activities.
More information
Mgr. Marie Timoščuková
Marie is an expert in labor law. She has extensive experience representing clients in employment disputes, from both sides of the "barricade" — that is, on behalf of both employers and employees. She has successfully defended the validity of many dismissals and has also helped employees recover numerous unlawfully withheld wages.
More information
Mgr. Vojtěch Adámek
Vojtěch is an experienced lawyer specializing mainly in disputes over claims arising from contracts, including settlement of parties after termination of contracts, debt collection and disputes over compensation for damage (damages). He considers understanding the client's needs and finding effective and pragmatic solutions together, including extrajudicial termination of disputes, as the key to success.
More information
Další oblasti sporu