Labour disputes

Disputes related to employment law often involve invalid terminations or wage and other related claims. As with a number of other situations, an experienced employment lawyer will help the most at the stage of preventing a judicial dispute or administrative proceedings.

We have divided the main areas where we help our clients to resolve processes or disputes related to the labor law agenda into the following areas:

Advice in relation to the unbalancing of working conditions

There may be situations when the employer is forced to dismiss his employees. This may be, for example, due to insufficient sales of production and the consequent organizational changes, as well as violations of labor discipline or unsatisfactory work results of the employee. In this case, the employment relationship with the employee is untied on the spot.

The assistance of a lawyer can consist not only in the preparation of the appropriate documentation, but also in the provision of advice for a particular procedure. However, we also represent employees with whom, on the contrary, the employment relationship has been terminated and seek the invalidation of such action. Likewise, on behalf of both parties, we address other problems that may arise in the workplace, whether related to remuneration or unequal treatment.

Representation in disputes arising from employment

Labour disputes have a number of specifics, whether they are irreversible deadlines for the application of certain claims or a specific procedure within the framework of the application of claims before the court. A special feature is that judges rule in chambers with alternates, and this element must therefore also be taken into account.

Some of the most common disputes are about the (not) valid termination of employment. Within two months of the termination of the employment relationship, the employee may challenge the validity of the act (typically dismissal or immediate cancellation) by which the employment relationship was terminated.

This type of legal proceedings is very specific. In such proceedings, the court will examine not only the fulfilment of the formal requirements, i.e. the manner of service, and whether the notice is worded correctly in accordance with the Labour Code, but also whether there really was a reason for the dismissal:

- in the case of dismissal for redundancy, the court will examine in detail the internal structure of the company and whether, taking into account all the circumstances, the employee in question was actually redundant;

- in the case of dismissal for violation of the duties of an employee or unsatisfactory work, the court will examine in detail the performance or behavior of the employee, the relations in the workplace and the specific circumstances that led to the dismissal. This kind of dispute is so extremely challenging and requires careful preparation for every negotiation. Sometimes even a seemingly insignificant (marginal) circumstance can decide whether the court finds the statement invalid;

- in the case of immediate termination of employment by the employer, it will then also be examined whether the intensity of the breach of obligations was such that such a breach can be described as having been committed in a particularly gross manner, etc.

The invalidation of the dismissal is also related to the claim for compensation of wages, which can significantly burden the employer who leads the dispute with the fired employee financially. However, the mere invalidation of the notice is not automatically sufficient for the establishment of a claim for compensation of wages. This, too, must be taken into account in such legal proceedings.

For any dismissal or immediate termination of employment, an individual assessment of all the circumstances that were relevant to the termination of the employment relationship is therefore absolutely necessary. In assessing these facts, it is therefore necessary to establish a maximally open relationship between the lawyer and the client (employer or employee) in order to choose the most appropriate strategy in the litigation.

And what are the other disputes about? In particular, the subject of disputes are financial claims, such as :

- financial claims for “lunch breaks”, which, given the degree of the employee's duties, do not constitute (unpaid) breaks at work for food and respite, taking into account recent case law of higher courts. The court will examine the specific duties of the employee in question;

- entitlement to the payment of bonuses or incentive components of remuneration. In such a case, the court will examine whether the bonus was entitled or unclaimed, or whether other criteria for the payment of the remuneration were met or whether the employer's conduct was “fair” in accordance with the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination in comparison with the remuneration of other employees;

- claims for compensation for damage caused by the employer or employee.

A very specific discipline is then litigation arising from accidents at work or occupational diseases. It is necessary to take into account all the circumstances that may have led to an occupational accident or illness and to assess the specific effects on the further employment and quality of life of the employee concerned.

Thus, labor litigation will mostly be an examination of specific relationships and specific circumstances occurring in a given workplace, and it is impossible to anticipate in advance the course of the legal proceedings, let alone the outcome itself. Thus, it is necessary at all times and in all circumstances for the lawyer to perceive the nature of the dispute in question and accordingly determine the further course of action, including an assessment of the question of whether it makes sense to go into the dispute “to the fullest” with the maximum of the requirements or, on the contrary, to attempt an amicable solution or even to completely withdraw from the enforcement of the claim.

Assistance to the employer in administrative proceedings

Sometimes there is even a situation when the labor inspectorate “knocks on the door” at the employer and starts an inspection. Unfortunately, even with the utmost care and legal treatment of all aspects, it can happen that the labor inspectorate unjustly introduces inspection findings of violation of certain obligations, whether they concern working time, remuneration or allowing illegal work. These findings are followed by administrative proceedings in which employers can be fined up to hundreds of thousands or even millions of crowns.

Many years of working with clients convinces us that it is good to think about the possible risks that may arise in the relationship between employee and employer. If some issues are not dealt with in a timely manner, it may be impossible to avert possible risks after the problem arrives. Even in an ideal work environment, it is so good to think about “what if”.

časté otázky

Co je dobré vědět o této oblasti?

What is an illegal decision of the authority?

The right to compensation for damage caused by an unlawful decision has the parties (including omissions) in which a decision was issued, as a result of which they suffered property or non-property damage. However, it is not enough just to disagree with the decision or to seek its annulment or to declare it incorrect at the next instance. Compensation can only be claimed if the decision has been annulled or changed for illegality after it has become legal (or if the decision is non-final but enforceable).

What is maladministration?

The definition of “maladministration” is quite broad, but in general it can be described as a violation of binding rules prescribed by legal norms for the conduct of a public authority in its activities, to which it is obliged and authorized on the basis of generally binding legislation. However, in the case of maladministration, this is not an illegal decision, but the procedure of the authority, which was subsequently reflected in its decision. It is often an unreasonable length of proceedings, where, although the decision given is legal in itself, the time until it is issued is contrary to procedural rules or reasonableness and the parties are therefore entitled to compensation for delays in the proceedings.

It is important not to miss the deadline for filing a lawsuit

Any claim or right must be exercised in a timely manner, that is, before the expiration of the limitation period and sometimes even a significantly shorter limitation period. While ordinary civil claims (for performance or damages) usually expire after 3 years, in a number of cases (administrative actions, actions for annulment in employment, rental or corporate matters) these are units of months! In any case, the sooner you seek out a professional, the more chances there will be to exercise the right properly and in a timely manner.

Do I need to be represented by a lawyer in the proceedings?

In general, it is not necessary to be represented by a lawyer in the proceedings before the court. Exceptions are appeal proceedings, cassation complaints, proceedings before the Constitutional Court and cases of so-called necessary defence in criminal cases. However, we recommend representation by a lawyer in the remaining proceedings, especially since the lawyer will recommend the client the most appropriate course of action to protect the client's rights.

What to do if I received an (electronic) payment order?

A duly served payment order becomes legal if you do not file an objection to the payment order within 15 days from the date of delivery, in the court that issued the payment order. In opposition, you express your disagreement with the imposed obligation and the court will therefore cancel the payment order. Subsequently, you will have a period of 30 days, in which you must indicate for what reason you do not agree with the filed lawsuit. If you did not complete such a justification, the court could rule by judgment of recognition.

Do you have other questions or
would you like to discuss your
specific situation?

Arrange a consultation
JUDr. Vít Kučera, MBA
Vít has extensive experience in representing clients before domestic and foreign courts, especially in commercial disputes. He specializes in preliminary measures, which he also deals with in his publishing activities. Since 2013 he also serves as an arbitrator of the Football Association of the Czech Republic.
More information
Mgr. Martin Tůma, Ph.D.
Martin mainly deals with commercial cases, including disputes arising from unfair competition, damages or insurance claims. He likes to look for simple solutions to (seemingly) complex problems. He also deals with construction law, in connection with which he represents clients in negotiations with administrative authorities and before the courts.
More information
JUDr. Lukáš Šikel
Lukáš is a lawyer specializing in litigation, both in court and in arbitration proceedings. He has represented clients in simple disputes, debt collection, as well as in complex cases, such as those in construction law. He also has experience representing clients in enforcement proceedings and insolvency cases.
More information
JUDr. Aleš Linhart, Ph.D.
Aleš specializes in disputes in the areas of real estate, liability for defects in construction, particularly in transportation infrastructure, the automotive industry, damage compensation and insurance, as well as pre-contractual liability. He represents clients in international arbitrations, including investment arbitrations. You can also appoint him as an arbitrator, as he is listed in the register of arbitrators of the Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and the Agrarian Chamber of the Czech Republic.
More information
Mgr. Kateřina Obertová
Kateřina has been involved in legal disputes since the beginning of her long-standing legal practice, during which she has dealt primarily with disputes arising from civil and commercial contracts, as well as cases related to family law and real estate ownership. In her legal practice, she places great importance on clarity and empathy, striving to offer clients functional and practical solutions.
More information
JUDr. Ing. Vít Švestka
Vít is a lawyer specializing in solving problems in the field of tax law before the tax authorities and the courts. He also acts as a tax advisor and thus can provide additional valuable advice and experience on how to reduce the risk of initiating proceedings at all. Vít also deals with corporate disputes. In addition to his legal education, he also holds a degree from the University of Economics in Prague, where he also participates in teaching and publishing activities.
More information
Mgr. Marie Timoščuková
Marie is an expert in labor law. She has extensive experience representing clients in employment disputes, from both sides of the "barricade" — that is, on behalf of both employers and employees. She has successfully defended the validity of many dismissals and has also helped employees recover numerous unlawfully withheld wages.
More information
Mgr. Vojtěch Adámek
Vojtěch is an experienced lawyer specializing mainly in disputes over claims arising from contracts, including settlement of parties after termination of contracts, debt collection and disputes over compensation for damage (damages). He considers understanding the client's needs and finding effective and pragmatic solutions together, including extrajudicial termination of disputes, as the key to success.
More information
Další oblasti sporu