Construction and ownership of real estate

IN Construction Law, We deal with construction from the conception of construction plans, to their permitting, to the actual implementation and subsequent resolution of any disputes.

The main areas where we help our clients resolve processes or disputes related to construction are divided into the following areas:

1. Proceedings before the building authority

We represent builders in dealing with permits, binding opinions and consents of the state administration authorities concerned (DOSS), whereby it is not only necessary  to convince the administrative authorities that the construction complies with the requirements of the Building Act, but also to defend the intended construction against the objections of the owners of surrounding properties.

However, we often find ourselves on the opposite side, defending the rights of the existing owners affected by the development, who have the opportunity in the zoning or subsequent construction proceedings to object to the pending changes to the zoning plan or construction plan and thus influence the final form of the intended zoning change or development.

2. Judicial review of the decision of the building authority by the court

The owners concerned can claim their rights not only in a multi-stage proceeding before the administrative authorities, but also request the review of administrative decisions before the administrative courts. Defence already in administrative proceedings is often a condition of raising objections even before a court, which guarantees independent judicial review of the decisions issued as well as all the underlying opinions.

The appellate and judicial review of administrative decisions can significantly delay the implementation of a construction project to the detriment of investors, but also protect the existing rights of owners, which is why we are also contacted by both investors and affected owners.

3. Disputes arising during construction or reconstruction

The relations between investors and contractors of buildings or renovations are stipulated by law to a minimum, and therefore it is necessary to conclude an appropriate contract for the work, which should adequately describe the entire course of construction and the eventualities that may arise during it.

In the event that a dispute arises, we are able to assess on whose side the law is on and also what is the most effective solution — which is usually not the case. However, the most important thing is the timeliness of the solution — when a problem in construction already arises, it is highly advisable to solve it legally from the beginning, or at least to respond in time, i.e. before the expiry of the relevant statutory deadline for exercising rights.

4. Project preparation and contract documentation for all phases of construction

As already mentioned, quality preparation is the best way to either prevent disputes or at least improve your position considerably if disputes do arise. Here more than anywhere else: “Clear contracts make good friends.”

We then apply our experience from disputes already in preparation of the relevant contractual documentation (works contract, license agreement for project documentation, construction financing contracts) and also provide legal assessments on critical parts of the project documentation for construction projects.

In the construction process itself, the completion and handover of the work is then critical, the form of which is left entirely to the contracting parties by law, and therefore it is necessary to agree on the procedure in advance. Our experience shows, for example, that the fatal flaw is an insufficiently or ambiguously described duty of cooperation between the contracting parties.

Due to insufficient contractual processing, even in larger projects, unnecessary disputes arise due to different ideas of the parties about how to solve a situation that was not envisaged by the brief contract. Legally unenforceable obligations (often e.g. assignment of builder's rights or binding of third parties who are not parties to the contract) are also a common shortcoming. On the other hand, contractual penalties, a lien with the possibility of outright sale or the possibility of a punitive withdrawal from the contract can be functional tools to enforce rights.

časté otázky

Co je dobré vědět o této oblasti?

What is an illegal decision of the authority?

The right to compensation for damage caused by an unlawful decision has the parties (including omissions) in which a decision was issued, as a result of which they suffered property or non-property damage. However, it is not enough just to disagree with the decision or to seek its annulment or to declare it incorrect at the next instance. Compensation can only be claimed if the decision has been annulled or changed for illegality after it has become legal (or if the decision is non-final but enforceable).

What is maladministration?

The definition of “maladministration” is quite broad, but in general it can be described as a violation of binding rules prescribed by legal norms for the conduct of a public authority in its activities, to which it is obliged and authorized on the basis of generally binding legislation. However, in the case of maladministration, this is not an illegal decision, but the procedure of the authority, which was subsequently reflected in its decision. It is often an unreasonable length of proceedings, where, although the decision given is legal in itself, the time until it is issued is contrary to procedural rules or reasonableness and the parties are therefore entitled to compensation for delays in the proceedings.

It is important not to miss the deadline for filing a lawsuit

Any claim or right must be exercised in a timely manner, that is, before the expiration of the limitation period and sometimes even a significantly shorter limitation period. While ordinary civil claims (for performance or damages) usually expire after 3 years, in a number of cases (administrative actions, actions for annulment in employment, rental or corporate matters) these are units of months! In any case, the sooner you seek out a professional, the more chances there will be to exercise the right properly and in a timely manner.

Do I need to be represented by a lawyer in the proceedings?

In general, it is not necessary to be represented by a lawyer in the proceedings before the court. Exceptions are appeal proceedings, cassation complaints, proceedings before the Constitutional Court and cases of so-called necessary defence in criminal cases. However, we recommend representation by a lawyer in the remaining proceedings, especially since the lawyer will recommend the client the most appropriate course of action to protect the client's rights.

What to do if I received an (electronic) payment order?

A duly served payment order becomes legal if you do not file an objection to the payment order within 15 days from the date of delivery, in the court that issued the payment order. In opposition, you express your disagreement with the imposed obligation and the court will therefore cancel the payment order. Subsequently, you will have a period of 30 days, in which you must indicate for what reason you do not agree with the filed lawsuit. If you did not complete such a justification, the court could rule by judgment of recognition.

Do you have other questions or
would you like to discuss your
specific situation?

Arrange a consultation
JUDr. Vít Kučera, MBA
Vít has extensive experience in representing clients before domestic and foreign courts, especially in commercial disputes. He specializes in preliminary measures, which he also deals with in his publishing activities. Since 2013 he also serves as an arbitrator of the Football Association of the Czech Republic.
More information
Mgr. Martin Tůma, Ph.D.
Martin mainly deals with commercial cases, including disputes arising from unfair competition, damages or insurance claims. He likes to look for simple solutions to (seemingly) complex problems. He also deals with construction law, in connection with which he represents clients in negotiations with administrative authorities and before the courts.
More information
JUDr. Lukáš Šikel
Lukáš is a lawyer specializing in litigation, both in court and in arbitration proceedings. He has represented clients in simple disputes, debt collection, as well as in complex cases, such as those in construction law. He also has experience representing clients in enforcement proceedings and insolvency cases.
More information
JUDr. Aleš Linhart, Ph.D.
Aleš specializes in disputes in the areas of real estate, liability for defects in construction, particularly in transportation infrastructure, the automotive industry, damage compensation and insurance, as well as pre-contractual liability. He represents clients in international arbitrations, including investment arbitrations. You can also appoint him as an arbitrator, as he is listed in the register of arbitrators of the Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and the Agrarian Chamber of the Czech Republic.
More information
Mgr. Kateřina Obertová
Kateřina has been involved in legal disputes since the beginning of her long-standing legal practice, during which she has dealt primarily with disputes arising from civil and commercial contracts, as well as cases related to family law and real estate ownership. In her legal practice, she places great importance on clarity and empathy, striving to offer clients functional and practical solutions.
More information
JUDr. Ing. Vít Švestka
Vít is a lawyer specializing in solving problems in the field of tax law before the tax authorities and the courts. He also acts as a tax advisor and thus can provide additional valuable advice and experience on how to reduce the risk of initiating proceedings at all. Vít also deals with corporate disputes. In addition to his legal education, he also holds a degree from the University of Economics in Prague, where he also participates in teaching and publishing activities.
More information
Mgr. Marie Timoščuková
Marie is an expert in labor law. She has extensive experience representing clients in employment disputes, from both sides of the "barricade" — that is, on behalf of both employers and employees. She has successfully defended the validity of many dismissals and has also helped employees recover numerous unlawfully withheld wages.
More information
Mgr. Vojtěch Adámek
Vojtěch is an experienced lawyer specializing mainly in disputes over claims arising from contracts, including settlement of parties after termination of contracts, debt collection and disputes over compensation for damage (damages). He considers understanding the client's needs and finding effective and pragmatic solutions together, including extrajudicial termination of disputes, as the key to success.
More information
Další oblasti sporu