Recovery of pecuniary receivables

If the customer has not paid you for the goods, the tenant has not paid the rent or the debtor has not returned the loan, you are probably deciding how to collect your claim as efficiently as possible. As for the pecuniary claim, then we call it a pecuniary claim, the recovery of which can be simplified by various instruments.

As the old Roman principle says: “pacta sunt servanda”, that is, contracts are to be observed. However, in practice this is very often not the case, which can lead to a situation where your contract partner gets in arrears fulfilment of contractual obligations and becomes your debtor.

From the moment of default, the creditor may also pursue his claims in court, even if this is the ultimate solution. Often, an out-of-court solution is sufficient, such as sending Pre-action challenges by an attorney, which often leads to either early repayment of the debt, or at least another agreement to resolve the situation, such as written recognition of the debt with an agreement on the repayment schedule, which can subsequently ensure the enforceability of the debt without the need for legal proceedings — such a claim can then be enforceable already at the moment when the debtor fails to repay any payment of the debt on time. Such Agreements are at least a temporary solution, for example, where the debtor is currently unable to repay the entire debt and may also give him the necessary incentive to repay the debt at least partially.

If such efforts fail, all that remains is to proceed with the judicial recovery of the claim, which should always be preceded by the aforementioned pre-action challenge. It is also advisable to check the debtor in the Insolvency Register and the Central Registry of Executions and to evaluate the expediency of judicial enforcement, or filing an application for insolvency proceedings.

For monetary claims, a lawsuit can be filed in a simplified form Proposal for the issuance of an electronic payment orderwhich makes it possible to simplify the whole process. However, if the debtor files a so-called opposition, the proceedings are conducted in the form of a “standard” dispute procedure, in which it will be necessary to prove the claim before the court. Only then can the court issue a judgment ordering the debtor to pay the debt (together with the accessories and, accordingly, reimbursement of the costs of the proceedings).

Only a final judicial decision (that is, one that cannot be further appealed against) is the so-called writ of execution, on the basis of which enforcement proceedings can be initiated, leading to the “involuntary payment” of the debt, e.g. through a bailiff.

As follows from the above, debt collection can be a fairly simple process, but it can also become considerably more complicated. However, the task of the lawyer is to arrange the whole process for you as efficiently as possible, preferably without the need for the involvement of the court, which, however, cannot be done without the cooperation of the debtor.

časté otázky

Co je dobré vědět o této oblasti?

What is maladministration?

The definition of “maladministration” is quite broad, but in general it can be described as a violation of binding rules prescribed by legal norms for the conduct of a public authority in its activities, to which it is obliged and authorized on the basis of generally binding legislation. However, in the case of maladministration, this is not an illegal decision, but the procedure of the authority, which was subsequently reflected in its decision. It is often an unreasonable length of proceedings, where, although the decision given is legal in itself, the time until it is issued is contrary to procedural rules or reasonableness and the parties are therefore entitled to compensation for delays in the proceedings.

What is an illegal decision of the authority?

The right to compensation for damage caused by an unlawful decision has the parties (including omissions) in which a decision was issued, as a result of which they suffered property or non-property damage. However, it is not enough just to disagree with the decision or to seek its annulment or to declare it incorrect at the next instance. Compensation can only be claimed if the decision has been annulled or changed for illegality after it has become legal (or if the decision is non-final but enforceable).

Should I oppose the lawsuit if I recognize the claim?

Even if you accept the claim, it is better to prevent a court decision on it, for example, by paying the debt earlier or by agreeing with the claimant, as the court will usually also impose an obligation on you to pay the costs of the plaintiff's proceedings. However, the plaintiff often has the will to agree to withdraw the action in exchange for at least partial or earlier payment of the debt. It always makes sense to at least attempt an extrajudicial action.

How to claim damage caused by the state?

A claim for compensation for damage caused by the state is applied in a different procedure than a normal claim. The first step is to apply for compensation to the competent authority, often the ministry. If the Office does not grant compensation within 6 months of the submission of the application, judicial enforcement may be initiated. In such proceedings, the injured party is partially advantaged, for example, by a reduced court fee and substantially lower costs in the event of failure.

Where do I file a lawsuit? And where's the appeal?

To file an action, it is necessary to designate a court of substantive and local jurisdiction. The district court (district court in Prague) is usually competent in the case. Local jurisdiction is usually determined according to the defendant's place of residence or domicile in the case of a legal entity.

Do you have other questions or
would you like to discuss your
specific situation?

Arrange a consultation
JUDr. Vít Kučera, MBA
Vít has extensive experience in representing clients before domestic and foreign courts, especially in commercial disputes. He specializes in preliminary measures, which he also deals with in his publishing activities. Since 2013 he also serves as an arbitrator of the Football Association of the Czech Republic.
More information
Mgr. Martin Tůma, Ph.D.
Martin mainly deals with commercial cases, including disputes arising from unfair competition, damages or insurance claims. He likes to look for simple solutions to (seemingly) complex problems. He also deals with construction law, in connection with which he represents clients in negotiations with administrative authorities and before the courts.
More information
Mgr. Kateřina Obertová
Kateřina has been involved in litigation since the beginning of her long legal practice, during which she dealt mainly with disputes arising from civil and commercial law contracts, as well as cases concerning family law or property ownership. In advocacy, he bases himself on clarity and empathy, with which he tries to offer functional and practical solutions to clients.
More information
JUDr. Ing. Vít Švestka
Vít is a lawyer specializing in solving problems in the field of tax law before the tax authorities and the courts. He also acts as a tax advisor and thus can provide additional valuable advice and experience on how to reduce the risk of initiating proceedings at all. Vít also deals with corporate disputes. In addition to his legal education, he also holds a degree from the University of Economics in Prague, where he also participates in teaching and publishing activities.
More information
Mgr. Marie Timoščuková
Marie is an expert in labor law. Therefore, he also has extensive experience in representation in labor disputes in the field of labor law, from both sides of the “barricade”, that is, on the part of both employers and employees. Thus, it has not only successfully defended the validity of the dismissal, but also obtained many illegally withheld bonuses to employees.
More information
Mgr. Vojtěch Adámek
Vojtěch is an experienced lawyer specializing mainly in disputes over claims arising from contracts, including settlement of parties after termination of contracts, debt collection and disputes over compensation for damage (damages). He considers understanding the client's needs and finding effective and pragmatic solutions together, including extrajudicial termination of disputes, as the key to success.
More information
Další oblasti sporu